The
venerated cancer organization says women should start getting
mammograms at 45 instead of 40, and that everyone can skip the routine
manual breast checks by doctors.
An
exhaustive review of the medical literature shows these measures just
aren't very effective, according to the group. "The chance that you're
going to find a cancer and save a life is actually very small," said Dr.
Otis Brawley, the society's chief medical officer.
Now three key groups -- the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the American Cancer Society, and the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force -- recommend different ages for starting regular mammograms: 40, 45 and 50 respectively.
While mammograms save lives, they can also cause harm, and each group does a different job of balancing the pros and cons.
The problem with mammogram is that they
have a relatively high false positive rate, which means women sometimes
have to undergo painful and time-consuming tests only to find out they
never had cancer in the first place.
Six years ago, the federal government's Preventive Services Task Force caused a furor
when it declared that women in their 40s didn't need to get routine
mammograms. Younger women whose breast cancers were caught by mammograms
angrily responded that they would have been dead if they'd followed
that guideline.
They said they'd
gladly risk a false positive, with all the inconvenient and sometimes
painful followup, for the chance of finding a cancer.
Learning
from that experience, the American Cancer Society has sought to soften
its message, emphasizing that women in their early 40s should still be
able to get mammograms if they want them, as long as they understand the
risks.
There's the risk of a false
positive, plus the risk that a mammogram could catch a very small breast
cancer that will go away on its own, or never progress to the point
that it hurts a woman. In other words, a mammogram could catch a tumor
that isn't really worth catching.
But
since doctors can't reliably discern the harmful from the harmless
cancers, they treat them all. This means some women are getting
potentially harmful treatments, such as radiation, chemotherapy and
surgery, when their tumor would never have caused a problem, Brawley
says.
A Canadian study
looked at 44,925 women who were screened for breast cancer, and 106 of
them fell into this category and were treated for breast cancer
"unnecessarily," according to a review in the New England Journal of Medicine.
Be aware and warned.
No comments:
Post a Comment