People who practiced acupuncture or the Alexander Technique had greater pain reductions than those who got standard treatment
Two alternative therapies get a boost of scientific legitimacy in a new study published in the Annals of Internal Medicine.
Acupuncture, the ancient practice of needle 
insertion, and the Alexander Technique, a program that teaches people 
how to avoid unnecessary muscle tension throughout the day and improve 
posture, coordination, balance and stress, are two complementary 
therapies often used to help treat neck pain. Treating it is often 
difficult, and it’s common for people to seek out alternative therapies.
The researchers wanted to see how well two of
 these worked. They assigned 517 people, all of whom had neck pain for 
at least three months (and sometimes many years), to the standard care 
for neck pain, which involves prescription medications and physical 
therapy. Some of the patients were assigned to also receive one of two 
extra treatments: a dozen 50-minute acupuncture sessions or 20 private 
Alexander Technique lessons—which focus on teaching people how to move 
their body to avoid or correct muscular pain.
A year after the start of the study, people 
in the groups doing acupuncture and the Alexander Technique had 
significant reductions in neck pain—pain was assessed by 
questionnaire—compared to those who just got usual care. Both groups 
reported about 32% less pain than they had at the start of the study, 
which is far greater than the 9% typically associated with physical 
therapy and exercise. The interventions also gave people in the groups 
more self-efficacy, which were linked to better pain outcomes.
The study adds to growing evidence suggesting that acupuncture is effective against pain; a landmark review
 in 2012 involving almost 18,000 people with chronic pain concluded that
 acupuncture was better than standard care and sham acupuncture (which 
proved the effect is not due to placebo of simply sticking needles in 
the body.)


No comments:
Post a Comment