Brazilian president Dilma Rousseff faces impeachment for allegedly breaking fiscal responsibility laws and manipulating government finances to benefit her reelection |
Brazil’s president Dilma Rousseff
has begun the fight for her political life after the first impeachment
proceedings for more than 20 years were launched against her in
Congress.
After months of jockeying,
the removal proceedings were pushed forward by her political nemesis –
the lower house speaker Eduardo Cunha – as Brazil slipped deeper into a
crisis that has hamstrung decision-making even while the economy suffers
its worst downturn since the Great Depression.
On Wednesday night, Cunha finally gave the green light to an
opposition motion for the country’s first female president to be ejected
from office on allegations that she broke fiscal laws by window
dressing government accounts ahead of her re-election last year.
Rousseff came out fighting. “I have received with indignation the decision by the head of the lower chamber to [launch] the impeachment process,” she said. “There is no wrongful act committed by me, nor are there any suspicions that I have misused public money.”
In a televised address to the nation, Rousseff expressed her
“outrage” at Cunha’s decision and said there was no evidence of any
wrongdoing by her.
“I’ve committed no illicit act, there is no suspicion hanging over me
of any misuse of public money,” the president said. “I don’t have any
offshore bank accounts, I have no hidden assets.” Her comment was a
direct jab at Cunha, who has been charged with taking millions in bribes
in connection to a kickbacks scheme that has embroiled state-run oil
company Petrobras.
Activists from the ruling Workers Party accuse Cunha and his supporters of plotting a coup.
Earlier this year, Cunha acknowledged that an impeachment, which
would be the first since 1992, would be a “backwards step for
democracy”. For months, he has sat on more than half a dozen previous
opposition proposals to remove an elected head of state who has served
only one year of her four-year mandate.
However, he has changed his tone as his own position has come under
threat. Julius Camargo, one of the whistleblowers in the Lava Jato
investigation into corruption at Petrobras, has testified that the Cunha
asked him for a $5m bribe – a claim that the speaker denies.
As pressure on Cunha mounted on Wednesday, he finally accepted a case
lodged by opposition lawyers Hélio Bicudo, Miguel Reale and Janaína
Paschoal.
It appeared at least partly motivated by self-defence, coming just
hours after lawmakers the Workers Party ethics committee announced plans
to seek his dismissal on grounds of corruption.
Cunha dismissed the idea that his decision was motivated by personal
or political reasons. “The basis of this [impeachment proceeding] is
purely technical,” he claimed.
On his Facebook page,
he wrote that he was responding to the demands of anti-government
protests earlier this year. “The demonstrations that took place
throughout Brazil – on March 15, April 12 and August 16 – were not in
vain!” he wrote. “The [impeachment] process will be followed by the
entire population.”
To proceed, the removal proposal needs the support of at least
two-thirds of the deputies, or 342 of the 513 votes in the lower house.
No comments:
Post a Comment