Paul Kagame could theoretically serve until 2034 under the recent changes to Rwanda’s constitution. Photograph: Solan Kolli/EPA/Corbis |
The Rwandan president, Paul Kagame, is to seek a third term in 2017, confirming a decision widely expected after the approval of constitutional changes.
He said in a televised address: “You requested me to lead the country
again after 2017. Given the importance and consideration you attach to
this, I can only accept. But I don’t think that what we need is an
eternal leader.”
Kagame has been president since 2000, but he has effectively been in
control since his forces marched into the Rwandan capital, Kigali, to
end the 1994 genocide.
He was originally limited to two terms, but Rwanda has approved changes to the constitution
that would effectively allow Kagame to stay in power until 2034. He can
run for another seven-year term in 2017, followed by two five-year
terms.
Kagame insisted for months that he had yet to make up his mind about whether to run in the election in 2017.
A referendum on the change, which drew the backing of 98% of those
who voted, prompted criticism from western governments, which worry
about the growing list of African leaders seeking to extend their
tenure.
Neighbouring Burundi was plunged into chaos in April
when the president, Pierre Nkurunziza, announced he would seek a third
term. This led to months of street protests and violence in which more
than 400 people died. Nkurunziza later won in a disputed vote.
Rights groups acknowledge that Kagame has broad support for rebuilding Rwanda, but accuse the authorities of stifling the media and opposition voices, charges that the government denies.
The US, which has long praised Kagame for transforming the country
since the genocide, said the president could best serve his nation by
stepping down in 2017.
The European Union criticised the speed at which the referendum vote
was held, saying it did not give enough time for the public to consider
the arguments. The vote took place about a month after the Rwandan
parliament gave its final approval to the changes.
The Democratic Green party, the main opposition group in Rwanda –
which is tiny and has no seats in parliament – had its attempt to block
the constitutional amendments rejected in the courts.
No comments:
Post a Comment